The Deal Fell Through: Understanding Pre-Contractual Liability and Its Legal Consequences

The concept of pre-contractual liability is governed by the Civil Code. It comes into play in situations where negotiations for a prospective deal have advanced to a point where an unjustified termination of those negotiations could be deemed unfair to the other party, potentially causing them harm.

In these circumstances, pre-contractual liability may be invoked, leading to specific consequences for the party at fault for failing to finalize the contract. The Civil Code of the Czech Republic outlines several provisions that can give rise to pre-contractual liability.

Negotiations to Conclude a Contract Without Genuine Intent (§1728, Paragraph 1)

The first scenario involves negotiations where one of the contracting parties engages in discussions without any genuine intention of finalizing the contract. While the Civil Code upholds the principle of freedom to negotiate, pre-contractual liability does not arise simply because a contract remains unformed, such as when the parties fail to reach an agreement. However, this freedom is not absolute; it has its limitations, particularly concerning bad faith.

An example of bad faith occurs when one party feigns interest in concluding a contract while lacking any real intention to do so. In such cases, liability arises when the party becomes aware that they will not proceed with the contract yet continues to engage in negotiations.

Non-Disclosure of Essential Information for Contract Conclusion (§1728, Paragraph 2)

The second aspect of pre-contractual liability involves a breach of the duty by one party to disclose all material facts that they know or should reasonably know, which are necessary for the other party to assess their interest in concluding the contract and the possibility of doing so.

This obligation encompasses both factual and legal matters that could impact the other party’s decision to enter into the contract. Specifically, it aims to prevent situations where one party is misled or deprived of critical information – often not publicly available – that could significantly influence their willingness to proceed with the agreement.

Unreasonable Termination of Negotiations (§1729)

Another situation that may lead to pre-contractual liability arises when the parties are at a stage in their negotiations where the conclusion of the contract appears highly probable. If one party terminates the negotiations without sufficient justification, despite the reasonable expectations of the other party, such behavior is deemed to be in bad faith according to the Civil Code. In this instance, the injured party is entitled to compensation.

While it is acknowledged that the autonomy of the parties in contractual negotiations inherently carries the risk that a contract may not ultimately be formed, this fact does not warrant legal repercussions on its own. However, it is crucial that negotiations are conducted fairly and transparently.

Pre-contractual liability specifically addresses instances of unfair negotiation practices and seeks to hold parties accountable for such conduct. Unfair practices include situations where one party withdraws from negotiations at the last moment without legal grounds. Typically, this occurs when the terms of the contract have already been agreed upon and only formalities remain, such as signing the contract or confirming financial capabilities.

Misuse of Confidential Information (§1730)

Another instance of pre-contractual liability arises from the misuse or disclosure of confidential information that one party obtains from the other during contract negotiations. This situation underscores the importance of protecting confidentiality and ensuring fair dealings between the parties throughout the negotiation process.

If one party violates this duty and gains an unfair advantage or enrichment as a result, they are obligated to return any benefits or profits derived from that breach to the other party. This principle reinforces the expectation that parties will handle sensitive information responsibly and ethically during negotiations.

Legal Consequences of Pre-Contractual Liability

The consequences of pre-contractual liability primarily involve the injured party’s right to seek compensation for damages incurred, in accordance with general rules regarding compensation for breaches of statutory obligations. In cases of bad faith – such as the unjustified last-minute termination of negotiations – compensation is typically limited to the damages resulting from the failure to conclude a contract on similar terms.

In these situations, damages may include the costs associated with negotiating the contract and, if applicable, lost profits due to the inability to finalize the agreement. If there is a breach of the obligation to protect confidential information, the injured party can recover any unjust enrichment received by the offending party, without limiting their right to claim additional damages.

Despite the seemingly clear legal framework governing compensation for damages, its practical application can be quite challenging. One of the primary difficulties lies in proving bad faith on the part of the offending party. In practice, a party that has committed an offense can often provide a plausible justification for their actions. If they can convincingly defend their position in court, the injured party may struggle to prove otherwise. This complexity makes the enforcement of pre-contractual liability more difficult in practice than it may initially appear.

Legal Services Available

If you require legal advice, representation in court, assistance with drafting legal documents, or a thorough analysis of contracts and labor disputes, please reach out to us for our consulting services. We are here to help you navigate the complexities of legal issues.

Simply fill out the form, and one of our specialists will contact you shortly to discuss your needs. Let us assist you in finding the best solutions for your legal challenges.

https://www.podnikatel.cz/clanky/predsmluvni-odpovednost-priklady-kdy-se-uplatnuje